3.1 C
Chatham-Kent
Friday, April 26, 2024

Strong, informative Chatham Voice

0
Sir: Jim Blake is to be commended for the stories in the April 28 Voice. The unadulterated truth expertly exposes CKHA's treatment of Sydenham...

CKHA’s numbers inaccurate: Wesley

0
Sir: While it is certainly time for all three CKHA Boards to get back to work – on solutions and moving forward with a...

Voice editorial just verbal junk, reader says

5
Sir: I read with disappointment Jim Blake’s recent editorial entitled “Open or Closed.” This is a disgraceful example of the media stirring the pot and...

Funding cuts frustrate doctors

1
Sir: In the last six months, I, along with 11,000 other Concerned Ontario Doctors, have watched with frustration as the Ontario Liberals have instituted...

The return of the blob

0
Sir: The Blob returned to Southern Ontario last year. No, not the remake of the cheesy Sci-Fi B movie from the 1950s starring Steve...

C-K cemetery bylaw explained

0
Sir: Recently, a letter to the editor was published regarding the new Municipal Cemetery By-Law 38-2016 that was approved by council on March 21. Unfortunately,...

Smart, easy decision to save dogs

0
Sir: In our municipality, we have had individuals arrested for dog fighting. To date, these people have numerous charges against them and three of...

Be aware of burial plot bylaw

6
Sir: The residents of Chatham-Kent are unaware that the Municipality of Chatham-Kent has bylaws in place that restrict where your loved ones can and...

The Voice earns reader’s respect

0
Sir: My heartiest congratulations to The Chatham Voice. You have done something I never thought you could do. You started a newspaper in the...

Reports lack all details

0
Sir: I have encountered a longstanding issue of incomplete and subjective reports to council unnecessarily contributing to costing Chatham-Kent millions of dollars in failed...