I hope for your support on Oct. 22 as I believe I have been an effective councillor over the last eight years.
I do my best to help citizens when they have problems with the city. I was for the hospice, fixing Memorial Arena and the new animal shelter.
I was against the railroad, raising taxes and keeping the current level of councillors.
I will continue to be a common sense voice for the people of Chatham. Thank-you for the opportunity to serve you.
- Do you support increasing funding for infrastructure given the fact several culverts and bridges – including the Third Street Bridge – have had emergency issues and closures recently?
No. We significantly fund infrastructure now.
- Would you support a tax freeze or rollback if it meant reduced staff and/or services?
Yes. I have made several motions to this, which failed.
- Would you support shifting some services to the private sector if those services could be done more efficiently that way?
Yes.
- Do you believe we need a municipal ombudsman or ethics commissioner?
We already have one, so yes.
- Do you support investigating a reduction in the number of council members?
Yes!!!!
- Should the municipality try to land an Ontario Cannabis Store as soon as possible?
No. Wait and see how it happens in other communities.
- Should council be more proactive in terms of working with landowners with contaminated wells?
Yes. I have supported the Water Wells folks from the start and have never supported turbine “willing host” status or investment in the turbines.
- Some critics say the municipal building department is an impediment to development in C-K. Do you agree?
No. I have only received a couple of complaints over the last eight years.
- Do you believe Chatham needs a new twin-pad arena?
Yes. But we must decide what we can do without as I would not support raising taxes.
- Should the municipality cut back on its expenditures for overseas economic development efforts?
Yes. It was a failure. Concentrate on local economic development.
- Should municipal councillors ever be forced to go the Freedom of Information route when seeking municipal information?
No. Neither should anyone else.
- Should members of the public have more access to municipal information without having to resort to an FOI?
Yes. As per number 11.