Conflict claim gets its day in court

Jul 24 • Feature Story, Local News2 Comments on Conflict claim gets its day in court

courtsignweb

A conflict of interest claim by former mayoral candidate Ian McLarty against Chatham-Kent Mayor Randy Hope will be heard Aug. 20 at 10 a.m.

McLarty filed the notice of application Tuesday afternoon. It alleges the mayor violated provincial conflict of interest regulations at a June 24 council meeting when he voted in favour of a $1.3 million grant to St. Clair College.

The college intends to use the funds to establish programs at the former Capitol Theatre Annex building, now owned by Apollo Construction of Blenheim.

Documents in the application indicate the mayor’s daughter, Melissa, is the operations manager of Apollo and as such will benefit from the grant.

hopewebHSHope said McLarty’s allegations are “reckless” and “politically motivated.

“There simply is no conflict. Even though I’m a public figure, there is a limit to these kinds of statements. People need to be held accountable for what they say,” he said. “I’m going to examine my legal options.”

The mayor said he feels badly for Apollo Construction.  “(Apollo owner) Fred (Naclerio) has done a lot of good in our community. He built a youth centre in Blenheim and donates a lot. He doesn’t deserve this.”

Ian McLarty

Ian McLarty

McLarty refuted any charges of political motivation.

“If I was just in this for the politics, why did I approach council and the mayor in private and ask for an investigation?” he said. “The only reason this is a public issue is because when you try to work behind the scenes, nothing gets done.”

McLarty’s notice lists 25 separate supporting documents, including information from newspapers in Blenheim and Chatham, cable television programming, radio news interviews, as well as web page listings, web links, Google search results, correspondence from municipal lawyer John Norton, and assorted other items.

Comments

comments

2 Responses to Conflict claim gets its day in court

  1. Crystal Ashburn says:

    Regardless of the intentional conflict of interest this decision should be under full review & retracted.
    The counsellors that voted in favour of this should be ashamed at their lack of representation.
    & consideration for 'Chatham Kent' as a whole INCLUDING those towns they so favourably.
    voted to amalgamate. There is room for economic development in many areas of Chatham Kent.
    & more so in the rural areas then city center. As we strive to keep our local library & theatre open.
    only to be told there are no solutions, no options. STOP THE EXCUSES, STOP PUSHING RURAL.
    COMMUNITIES UNDER THE RUG – OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE SOLUTIONS!
    DISTRIBUTE 1.3 MILLION MORE EQUALLY RATHER THEN INVESTING SUCH A RIDICULOUS.
    AMOUNT TO your benefit Mr. Hope!

  2. Cheryl Lounsbury says:

    Well said Crystal… I.3 million? We the people have no say?, get rid of the politicians. We the people are able to powere them out. I think it is time for our young to take over. Wtg McLarty… but put the money were it needs to be like Crystal says.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

« »