Flying turbine debris has local MPP concerned

Nov 21 • Feature Story, Local News12 Comments on Flying turbine debris has local MPP concerned

1127turbine chunk1web

Local resident David Cofell found this piece from a wind turbine blade in his field after it flew off from a nearby turbine.

The provincial Ministry of Energy will launch an investigation into reports that an 18-inch chunk of a wind turbine blade came loose and flew some 400 feet before landing in a field in the former Howard Twp.

Chatham-Kent-Essex MPP Rick Nicholls raised the matter during question period Wednesday at Queen’s Park, calling it a significant safety issue that must be addressed immediately.

“Will your government do the do the right thing and put a moratorium on turbine developments until there is a thorough review of safety standards pertaining to industrial wind turbines,” he asked Premier Kathleen Wynne.

Energy Minister Bob Chiarellli said he was unaware of the problem but will raise the issue with his staff as well as those at the ministries of environment and climate change.

Nicholls said called the detached section “flying shrapnel” since the 400-foot tall turbines with blade lengths of 135 feet rotate at nearly 200 miles per hour at the blade tip.

In an interview with The Voice, Nicholls said, “we need to know just how widespread this problem is,” he said. “We have scores of turbines along the (Highway) 401 and this kind of flying shrapnel could result in a fatality. The government’s first responsibility is to the citizens of Ontario, not the wind companies or whatever agreements they may have made with private individuals.”

David Cofell, who found the serrated section of blade on his property was surprised how quickly a representative of South Kent Wind arrived at his Base Road home even though he hadn’t contacted the firm.

Before he did, however, he had in his possession photos of the blade and of a nearby turbine with a section missing.

Cofell was planting clover seeds in April on his 250-acre property when he found the piece of metal.

“I told a few people about it and I received a visit from one of their people, a guy named Alex,” he said. “He wouldn’t leave until I gave it to him. I finally did.”

He finally brought the matter to Chatham-Kent-Essex MPP Rick Nicholls because he was concerned that his incident may not be isolated.

“I’ve been told that turbine owners have to sign confidentiality agreements,” he said. “This could be happening some where else and no one’s talking about it because they can’t. I don’t want to see someone get hurt.”

Although the blade section wasn’t heavy, he believes it could have injured someone when it landed.

He found the blade chunk some 200 feet inside his property and the turbine with the section missing is situated about 200 feet from his property line.

Telephone and email inquiries to Pattern Energy and Samsung, operators of the South Kent Wind project haven’t been returned.

Cofell said Nicholls’ office played a key role in getting him compensation for damage caused by turbine surveyors three years ago.

“They just showed up on my land,” he said. “I had to chase them down and tell them to get off. They gave me the excuse that they didn’t want to damage my neighbours land and they couldn’t find a lane to drive on. They were pretty arrogant.”

After three years of trying to get compensation for damage, he contacted Nicholls.

“Right after that, they showed up and made me an offer,” he said. “Before that I couldn’t get the time of day.”

Cofell said he didn’t want to disclose the amount for fear of action from the company.

“I was treated fairly in the end,” he said. “It wasn’t a lot but it covered what they had done.”

During question period, Nicholls also raised the issue of eight wind turbines ordered removed in the vicinity of the Chatham Airport earlier this year and requested a moratorium on development.

Transport Canada’s order has so far been ignored.

“I’ve spoken with many pilots, and they all say that it’s too dangerous to fly in and out of that airport, especially when there are adverse weather conditions,” Nicholls continued. “These turbines pose a huge safety issue around any airport, whether it is in Chatham or even Collingwood. Literally translated, Premier, an encounter with one of these imposing turbines or pieces of shrapnel will result in body bags. None of us want that.”

Environment Minister Glen Murray said although the government takes “these things very seriously,” there needs to be perspective since large pieces have fallen off buildings in downtown Toronto and “no one opposite suggested that we put a moratorium on condominium construction in Toronto, because you know what the reaction would be.”

For a full Hansard transcript of Nicholls’ questions, click here.

1127turbine chunk2web

Comments

comments

12 Responses to Flying turbine debris has local MPP concerned

  1. Dave Madox says:

    I would like to put a wind turbine 550 metres from the centre of Glen Murray's house. Great to know that rural people are unimportant to the ministers in Queen's Park.

  2. Colette Montgrain McLean says:

    Equating condo windows falling to wind turbine shrapnel is a classical circular argument technique that the wind industry( along with Mr. Murray) love to use to divert the blame. Mr. Murray seems to forget that if condo windows falling became a running problem, there is a system in place to have industry & gov't investigate and further construction could be forced to stop until such time this problem is resolved. There is nothing in place through regulatory requirements for wind turbines and clearly rural residents are being regarded as nothing more than expendable collateral by this Liberal gov't.

  3. Colette Montgrain McLean says:

    I've posted on http://www.illwind.org; a website dedicated to collecting all the negative effects from wind turbines.

  4. Carmen McCauley says:

    What are out Councillors saying about this Jim? This is pretty significant.

  5. These serrated edges have been retrofitted onto wind turbine blades to make them more audibly quiet. The maximum noise reduction is around 5 dB. The serrated components, to my knowledge, have no mitigating effect on ILFNs, which have been implicated in causing many medical issues in people. They are used to shoe horn the machines into noise compliance and to make the operators appear to be doing something to protect the public. The serrations are just another part of the smoke and mirrors game that the wind power industry uses to pull the wool over the public's eyes.

  6. Betty Taylor Holland says:

    I heard they where to make sure the birds and bats where killed and not injured when they came into contact with the blades.

  7. Cathy Doyle says:

    The current government is bought and paid for by the Wind Companies. Our tax dollars, instead of being used to improve roads, education, etc, are used to pay off the US to take our excess power. Schools closing, medical services being cut but we will be paying for these turbines for the next 20+ years. Also – the bats lungs rupture and they bleed out – they are not killed by hitting the towers.

  8. charlene winger says:

    All very good comments made in response to a very sad situation for rural ontario….which eventually will impact all of ontario, including the cities.

  9. Bill Brooks says:

    What about all the branches flying through the air, steel off barn roofs and shingles off of homes. There all just as dangerous.

  10. Jody Maynard says:

    Betty Taylor Holland bats are dying because when they pass between the blades the sudden air pressure drop causes there lounges to collapse. http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/11/19/wind-farms-causing-thousands-of-bats-to-die-of-collapsed-lungs-annually-in-alberta-top-bat-expert/

  11. Jody Maynard says:

    For the employee named Alex.. he would have still been sitting at the road in front of my house.. I wouldn't have given him sh!t..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

« »